Scared Shiftless

by Ruth Ann Harnisch on 04/20/09 at 9:27 am

Even though I haven’t earned a journalism paycheck in over a decade, I woke up several times last night because of terrifying “What Happened To My Job?” dreams.

The seeds of these nightmares were probably planted when longtime Nashville television news anchor Dan Miller died last week.  It’s almost as if the work I used to do was buried along with him. People said he was the last of the old-time anchormen in that city. All over the country, television personalities who’ve been household names for decades are being handed their walking papers. They’re too expensive, too old, or too old-school.

Shelly Palmer’s blogpost is probably responsible for kicking last night’s bad dreams into high gear.

I was ahead of my time in maximizing multiple streams of journalistic income – ever fearful of the capriciousness of the industry and the crazy people who ran it, I took every job that was offered without bothering to quit the others. At one point, I was working at two radio stations, two newspapers, a television station, and doing whatever freelance work I could.

My definition of success in media was always simple: “I have a job.”  One of my former colleagues used to have a saying: “If you’re working, you’re winning.”  True then, truer today

The glamour gigs have turned to grunt work.  That doesn’t mean there’s not room for the individual to carve out a career – witness the viral success of (I can hardly bring myself to repeat her name, I’m so tired of it) Susan Boyle.  Buy the new book “Be The Media” and learn to harness the power of communication for yourself.

I read that the New York Times has been asking everyone on staff to help think of ideas to maximize revenue.  Many years ago, when I was still working at the Nashville Banner (when there still was a Nashville Banner), I attended a private luncheon in the board room of the Times. It was a YPO conference off-site, and I was there as my husband’s spouse. In conversation with Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger, I said I thought it was part of my job to be on the constant lookout for revenue sources for my newspaper. He disagreed strongly, telling me that nothing could be more wrong than for someone from editorial to think about the business side. His tone registered the kind of disapproval one might reserve for a streetwalker. Whenever I’ve thought about the conversation, and believe me, every time I see his name I think about that dressing-down, I’ve blushed.  Well, that’s over. Dear Mr. Sulzberger, if you want to tell me how sorry you are that you scolded me for being 15 years ahead of you on this story, I’ll even pick up the lunch tab.


4 Comments

Soni

Apr 20th, 2009

I hear that several articles have been talking about sabbaticals as a cost-saving measure, and I saw that at least one big firm is offering dozens of staff a year off at something like 30% pay with full benefits. That may end up being the best stop-gap measure for some companies who don’t want to lose key staff but need to stop the hemorrhaging until the economy pulls out of it’s current nosedive.

Pam O'Connor

Apr 20th, 2009

Ruth Ann, you were ALWAYS ahead of your time, and isn’t it ironic how that separation of editorial and advertising has come home to roost?

Maybe if the folks delivering the “news” nowadays (or I should say their spin on the news) would think more like business people by being more consumer-centric (i.e., how about giving me the facts and letting me make up my own mind), newspapers wouldn’t be going out of business and major networks wouldn’t be having basement ratings. It’s not about left or right, or Democrat vs. Republican. It’s about respecting the regular people out there who truly can think for themselves. Mr. Sulzberger should have paid more attention to you!

Digidave

May 29th, 2009

I have to agree with you on this Ruth.

Mixing editorial folks and business thinking isn’t wrong. It’s just that for a long time – the newspaper industry editorial folk didn’t have to think about it. This was a luxury.

That luxury is well behind us.

I am proof positive. I graduated from Columbia’s school of journalism – arguably one of the best in the country.

I left the school with few-to-no skills on the biz side of things. That hasn’t helped me in trying to start up my own nonprofit.

From J-schools on up – journalists need to learn the business side of things.

Linda Just

Oct 5th, 2009

It’s called hutzpah and smarts combined, ruthie! No way to control you!

Too many ‘men’ of the ‘old’ school were threatened by it. Imagine what could happen if a woman was

Leave a Comment